Skip to the main content.

1 min read

Haida Nation v. British Columbia

Haida Nation v. British Columbia
statue with scales
Photo: Shutterstock

Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests)[1]Supreme Court of Canada, 2004

The Haida case is significant because a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada set out the basic principles applicable to the duty to consult.

The Council of the Haida Nation brought an action against the Provincial Crown and Weyerhaeuser Company Limited for not properly consulting with the Haida Nation when renewing a tree farm licence on Haida Gwaii (Queen Charlotte Islands). Tree Farm Licence 39, issued to Weyerhaeuser, contained several areas of old-growth red cedar – a culturally significant tree used for totem poles, canoes, and log houses. The Haida Nation wanted large areas of old-growth forest protected from clearcutting and its potentially detrimental effects on land, watershed, fish, and wildlife.

By a unanimous (7-0) decision delivered by Chief Justice McLachlin, the Supreme Court of Canada went a long way toward providing the clarity and direction arising from Delgamuukw decision and the Court of Appeal decisions in Haida Nation and Taku River Tlingit. The strongly worded judgment makes two issues very clear. First, both orders of government have an inescapable Constitutional duty to consult and accommodate Aboriginal communities, in a manner that is meaningful, timely and reflective of the “honour of the Crown”, regarding potential infringement on an Aboriginal right or title. Second, that duty rests with the Crown; it cannot be delegated to and does not otherwise extend to third parties (i.e. to industry).

[1] Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) 2004 SCC 73

This is an excerpt from the 3rd edition of our book Working Effectively with Aboriginal Peoples®

By the way, we talk all about these cases in our in-person, live-guided and self-guided training.

Sign up for our Working Effectively With Indigenous Peoples Training

Mikisew case

3 min read

Mikisew case

Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage) [1]- Supreme Court of Canada, 2005 Duty to Consult in Post-Treaty Context The...

Read More
Meares Island case 1985

3 min read

Meares Island case 1985

Martin [1], Supreme Court & Court of Appeal of British Columbia 1985 - ongoing In 1984, members of the Nuu-chah-nulth First Nation and other...

Read More
West Moberly Case

2 min read

West Moberly Case

West Moberly First Nations v. British Columbia (Chief Inspector of Mines) [1] BC Court of Appeal, 2011 In the West Moberly case, the Court of Appeal...

Read More